Intermediary Data Fraud
Intermediary Data‑Theft Scams
1. Why the Threat Matters
Scammers targeting finance professionals are no longer after cash alone. Their real prize is your confidential banking data—the issuing bank’s direct contacts, internal procedures, and account identifiers you need to monetize assets such as SBLCs, commodity contracts, or other trade instruments. Once they have that information they can:
- Pose as you in future negotiations.
- Launch convincing phishing attacks against the issuing bank.
- Sell the data to other fraud rings.
Because the payoff is information, the scam often looks less aggressive, making it easy to overlook—until the damage is already done.
2. How the Scam Operates
| Step | Scammer Action | Red Flag |
|---|---|---|
| Initial outreach | Sends a free‑domain email (Gmail, Yahoo, Outlook) promising a massive deal (e.g., “$100 billion SBLC monetization”). | Public‑email address, exaggerated figure, generic greeting. |
| Commission negotiation | States the standard monetization rate is 65 % + 2 % commission. To reach 70 % + 2.5 % the SBLC must be placed in an “investment program.” Then demands that the intermediary keep all profit beyond 72.5 % for ten months of the program. | Unreasonable profit‑splitting, demand for a share of future earnings that a broker cannot legally control. |
| Main communication via WhatsApp | All messages are exchanged on WhatsApp, written in ALL CAPS and riddled with spelling and grammatical errors. No PDF, no formal letterhead—only screenshots of a prior contract. | Use of an insecure, informal platform for high‑value negotiations; sloppy caps signal a lack of professionalism and make the content hard to verify. |
| Email follow‑up | Switches to email and repeats the same boilerplate phrases without ever providing the requested documents (formal PDF contract, client‑information sheet, or proof of the SBLC). | Repetition without new information indicates a script‑driven approach rather than a genuine transaction. |
| Obsession with banker’s information | Continuously asks for the issuing bank’s direct phone number, private email, and internal workflow documents, despite repeated refusals. | Persistent request for private bank contacts before any signed agreement is a classic data‑theft indicator. |
| Repeated persistence without commitment | After you indicated that the 72.5 % rate was not acceptable, he kept returning, insisting that you either accept the terms or he would “walk away.” He never presented a concrete client, a client‑information sheet, or a live call with the ultimate beneficiary. | No real client, no client‑information sheet, no live client call, and a pattern of “either accept or I’ll leave” that signals a pressure tactic without a genuine offer. |
3. Why Free‑Domain Emails and WhatsApp Are Warning Signs
- No corporate branding – Legitimate intermediaries operate under a registered domain (e.g., @ymflow.com).
- Easily abandoned – A Gmail or Yahoo address can be discarded instantly, leaving no trace.
- WhatsApp is insecure for contracts – The platform does not provide immutable records, encrypted file storage, or legal standing for documents. Capital‑letter, typo‑filled messages further undermine credibility.
- Chain of “lousy” intermediaries – Each hand‑off adds noise, making the original source impossible to verify.
4. Revised Practical Safeguards (When the Intermediary Appears 99 % Untrustworthy)
-
Insist on a live, face‑to‑face verification with the SBLC owner
Arrange a video conference (Zoom, Teams, or any encrypted platform) where the supposed SBLC seller can show the original document, government‑issued ID, and the issuing bank’s official letterhead.
Why it works: A genuine holder can present the physical (or scanned) SBLC in real time, prove ownership, and answer spontaneous questions that a fraudster cannot anticipate. -
Never pay any advance or “processing” fee
Classic vigilance: authentic SBLCs or ABLCs (Asset‑Backed Letters of Credit) never require upfront payments to a third‑party intermediary.
Why it works: Requiring a fee is a textbook red flag. Legitimate banks and sellers fund the transaction themselves; they do not ask strangers to front money. -
**Validate the issuing bank directly, independently of the intermediary
Call the bank using the publicly listed telephone number on its official website (or send an encrypted email to the bank’s official support address). Ask them to confirm the SBLC’s existence, its serial number, and the name of the rightful holder.
Why it works: The bank will never confirm details to an unknown third party, but it will respond to a verified client or a legitimate holder. -
Use secure, traceable communication for all document exchange
Switch from WhatsApp to encrypted email (PGP/GPG) or a secure file‑sharing service (e.g., Proton Drive). Every file should be signed digitally by the SBLC owner.
Why it works: Digital signatures provide cryptographic proof of origin, and encrypted channels protect the data from interception or tampering. -
Document every step
Record timestamps of the video call, save the meeting transcript, and keep a log of all emails and phone calls.
Why it works: A clear audit trail makes it easier to involve law enforcement or a regulator if the deal turns out to be fraudulent.
5. Red‑Flag Checklist Specific to This Scam
- All‑caps, sloppy WhatsApp messages – Indicates a lack of professionalism and makes the content difficult to verify.
- Repeated boilerplate email replies – No new information, no attached PDFs, no client‑information sheet despite explicit requests.
- No PDF with a clear procedure – Only a screenshot of an old contract was provided.
- Missing client‑information sheet – No details about the ultimate client, their identity, or their financial standing.
- No live client call – The supposed client never appeared on a video or phone call; only the intermediary communicated.
- Greedy profit split – Demanding “all profit beyond 72.5 % for ten months” is legally impossible for a broker and signals a con‑artist looking to skim any margin.
- Obsession with banker’s contact details – Persistent request for private bank contacts before any signed agreement.
- “Accept or I’ll walk away” pressure – Repeatedly pressuring you to agree without ever presenting a real client or concrete documentation.
6. Real‑World Illustration (Redacted)
An intermediary named “Mr NG” emailed YMFlow from a Gmail address, claiming a client wanted to monetize a $100 billion SBLC. He explained that the standard rate is 65 % + 2 % commission, but to reach 70 % + 2.5 % the SBLC must be placed in an “investment program.” He then demanded that he keep all profit beyond 72.5 % for ten months of the program.
All subsequent communication took place on WhatsApp, written entirely in ALL CAPS and riddled with spelling mistakes. When YMFlow switched to email, the intermediary repeated the same boilerplate phrases and never attached the requested formal PDF contract, client‑information sheet, or any proof of the SBLC’s existence. Instead, he kept asking for the issuing bank’s direct phone number, private email, and internal workflow documents—an obvious attempt to harvest the bank’s contact sheet.
Despite YMFlow’s refusal to provide those details, the intermediary persisted, saying that if the 72.5 % arrangement was not accepted he would “go away,” yet he kept returning to the conversation without ever presenting a real client or concrete documentation.
Our response:
- Video‑call demand – We told the intermediary we would only proceed after a live video call with the actual SBLC holder. He could not arrange it.
- No fee acceptance – We refused any advance‑fee request, citing the standard rule that genuine SBLCs never require such payments.
- Direct bank verification – Using the bank’s public contact details, we asked the bank to confirm the SBLC’s existence. The bank had no record of any such instrument.
- Secure channel switch – We asked for the document to be sent via encrypted email with a digital signature; the intermediary never complied.
The intermediary stopped responding. No bank data was disclosed, and the potential breach was averted.
7. Bottom Line
- Intermediary scams are fundamentally data‑theft operations.
- Free‑domain emails, ALL‑CAPS WhatsApp messages, repeated boilerplate email replies, missing PDFs, greedy profit‑splitting demands, and the “accept or I’ll walk away” pressure tactic are strong indicators of malicious intent.
- When the intermediary appears 99 % untrustworthy, the only reliable path forward is a live, verifiable video call with the actual SBLC seller, coupled with the classic rule that no legitimate SBLC or ABLC ever demands an advance fee.
- Validate the issuing bank independently, use encrypted, auditable channels, and keep a meticulous record of every interaction.
Applying these safeguards protects not only your money but also the critical banking relationships that underpin your business. If a deal feels too good and the intermediary pushes you onto public email or WhatsApp—especially with sloppy, all‑caps messages and an obsessive demand for your banker’s contact sheet—walk away, or demand a real‑time, face‑to‑face verification before you proceed.


